Old Pulteney 2006 Vintage (1L) Whisky

Scotch Whisky • 100cl • 46%
Product details
Old Pulteney 2006 Vintage (1L)
£42.78
Sold out

More Alternatives…

Old Huddart
Old Huddart
£49.50
£45
 Old Pulteney
Old Pulteney
£34.75
 Old 12 Year Old
Old 12 Year Old
£33.49
 Old Pulteney 13yo
Old Pulteney 13yo
£55.28
 Old Pulteney 16yo
Old Pulteney 16yo
£76.12
 Old 15 Year Old
Old 15 Year Old
£79.50
£77.25

You might also like

Country Scotch Whisky
Region Highland Whisky
Distillery/Brand Pulteney
Distillation Date 2006
Style Single Malt Whisky

Old Pulteney 2006 (1L)

An Old Pulteney single malt from 2006, which was left to age in first fill American oak bourbon barrels selected by Malcolm Waring, distillery manager. The no age statement whisky was bottled in 2017 at 46% ABV, presented in the recognisable Old Pulteney bottle.

Tasting Note by The Chaps at Master of Malt

Nose Sharp green apple skin, with lemon drizzle cake, desiccated coconut, salted caramel and buttery croissant.

Palate Somewhat oily, with a vibrant burst of citrus, with tangy grapefruit and lemon, leading into honeyed malt cereal, brioche and coconut cream balanced by maritime salinity, with a sea breeze running throughout.

Finish Vanilla, oak spice, sweet malt and oak char.

Allergy information

This product does not contain any notifiable allergens
More allergen information
Reviews for Old Pulteney 2006 Vintage (1L)
A very decent Old Pulteney
I think Old Pulteney is best matured in bourbon barrels and this dram is from all first fill so I was expecting a lot of vanilla sweetness to offset the usual saltiness - and that's just what I got. I didn't get much spice on the finish but I got a whisky that perilously easy to enjoy, with or without a drop of water. It's a 2006 vintage but try as I might I could find no reference on the bottle or box to the 2017 bottling date mentioned above so it must be classed as a NAS whisky. It reminds me of Old Pulteney of yesteryear before the current 12yo supermarket-available came to prominence, which I find a bit thin and lacking in punch. This version is certainly not that so for those hankering for a more robust OP, this is one for you.
Robert S , United Kingdom
2 years ago